<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geoff Evason &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geoff.evason.name/tag/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geoff.evason.name</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 03:41:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>3 More Reasons Not To Vote For Clinton</title>
		<link>http://geoff.evason.name/2008/05/15/3-more-reasons-not-to-vote-for-clinton/</link>
		<comments>http://geoff.evason.name/2008/05/15/3-more-reasons-not-to-vote-for-clinton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoff.evason.name/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As the battle for the democratic nomination continues in the US, here are 3 more reasons not to vote for Hillary Clinton.
1.    She&#8217;s Losing
2.    She&#8217;s Out Of Money
3.    She Can&#8217;t Spell
Sound harsh, trivial, or silly? Let me explain. Each of these reasons are the result of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="digg"><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<p>As the battle for the democratic nomination continues in the US, here are 3 more reasons not to vote for Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p>1.    She&#8217;s Losing<br />
2.    She&#8217;s Out Of Money<br />
3.    She Can&#8217;t Spell</p>
<p>Sound harsh, trivial, or silly? Let me explain. Each of these reasons are the result of very real and very significant leadership flaws exhibited by Mrs. Clinton.</p>
<p>1. She&#8217;s Losing</p>
<p>Senator Clinton is, undoubtedly, an accomplished woman; even if <a title="clinton experience in doubt" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/07/clintons-experience-on-w_n_90398.html">her experience is questioned</a>.  She was the clear favorite near the end of 2007.  In fact, she held a <a title="clinton leads in polls" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21690578/">23% lead</a> over Obama in the polls.  By all accounts the nomination was hers to lose &#8211; and lose it she did. If her leadership throughout her campaign has seen her turn from a dominate favorite into an <a title="funny clinton cannot win" href="http://www.eyesonobama.com/blog/content/id_16410/title_5-Ways-Hillary-Clinton-Can-Still-Win/">also-ran</a>, just imagine what her leadership for America would do.</p>
<p>2. She&#8217;s Out Of Money</p>
<p>The Clinton campaign recently announced it is <a title="clinton in debt" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/13/politics/main4091473.shtml">$20M in debt</a>.  The campaign to date has <a title="clinton fundraising" href="http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/money/">raised $194M</a>, so she has overspent by more than 10.3%. This clearly demonstrates her willingness to be fiscally irresponsible in order to pursue her goals. To demonstrate what this would look like on a national scale, the <a title="us budget 2007 outlook" href="http://origin.www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy09/pdf/budget/outlook.pdf">2007 tax receipts were $2.568 Trillion</a> and the deficit was $162 Billion; this was only a 6.3% overspend.  Let me stress this point: if Clinton ran America like she ran her campaign, the country&#8217;s deficit would be significantly higher than it is under the current Bush administration.  America can ill-afford more <a title="bush poor fiscal management chart" href="http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/rchart4.gif">fiscal disasters</a>.</p>
<p>3. She Can&#8217;t Spell</p>
<p>Good leaders surround themselves with intelligent and capable people.  This <a title="clinton letter to obama" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/m.s.-bellows/clintons-open-letter-to-o_b_100861.html">recent open letter</a>, from Clinton to Obama, contained several mistakes including the &#8216;creative&#8217; words &#8220;<a title="untaken not a word" href="http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/untaken">untaken</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a title="publically" href="http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/publically">publically</a>&#8220;.  I can&#8217;t fault her for making some typos &#8211; I make them all the time.  With such an important letter though, one or more of her staff should have checked it. So did Clinton not have her staff read it, or did they just miss the obvious mistakes?  I&#8217;m not sure which is worse but neither is what you want from a president.</p>
<p>A candidate&#8217;s <a title="primaries candidates issues" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21116732">positions on the issues</a> and their leadership abilities are both important to consider. I truly commend Hillary Clinton; She has done well to get to where she is today.  She is not, however, a leader that can be trusted as President.  A president should be able to win a battle, especially when they start in the lead.  A president should be responsible.    A president should surround themselves with capable staff.  Clinton has demonstrated through her campaign that she does not have these 3 leadership traits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geoff.evason.name/2008/05/15/3-more-reasons-not-to-vote-for-clinton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Statistician Might Have A Bit Of An Obama Bias</title>
		<link>http://geoff.evason.name/2008/05/07/cnns-statistician-might-have-a-bit-of-an-obama-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://geoff.evason.name/2008/05/07/cnns-statistician-might-have-a-bit-of-an-obama-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geoff.evason.name/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find the US election process interesting.  It&#8217;s convoluted and archaic, but insanely important to the world as a whole.
I was just looking at the results of the Indiana and North Carolina primaries today and noticed a very interesting result on CNN.  I think their statistician may be a little bit biased toward [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the US election process interesting.  It&#8217;s convoluted and archaic, but insanely important to the world as a whole.</p>
<p>I was just looking at the results of the Indiana and North Carolina primaries today and noticed a very interesting result on CNN.  I think their statistician may be a little bit biased toward Obama.  I&#8217;m not sure what&#8217;s more interesting; that Obama is projected to win despite have less votes, or that he is projected to win despite 0% of votes being reported.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone aligncenter" src="http://geoff.evason.name/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/cnn_obama_results.png" alt="CNN Obama Results" /></p>
<p>Okay, in reality, the projection is probably based on exit polling, whereas the numbers are based on actual counted votes.  It was still funny to see though&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://geoff.evason.name/2008/05/07/cnns-statistician-might-have-a-bit-of-an-obama-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

